Global ChinaEpistemic Traps and Analytical Registers
Global China
Epistemic Traps and Analytical Registers
Dokument öffnen (635.4KB)Datum der Veröffentlichung
2025Verlag / herausgebende Einrichtung
Routledge, Taylor & Francis GroupVerlagsort
LondonMetadaten
Zur Langanzeige
Zitierbarer Link (Handle URI) 
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/13681
Inhalt
The contributions to The Routledge Handbook on Global China highlight the diverse and dynamic relations between Global China and multiple actors, contexts and agencies. The relationship between China's international outreach and the effects of Global China is not straightforward, and understanding the nature and implications of China's rise requires acknowledging the multiple sites, voices and faces of Global China. The Handbook reveals epistemic traps that hinder the understanding of Global China, such as othering and strategic narcissism. It argues for a more nuanced approach that embraces alternative perspectives and challenges existing binaries. The Handbook also emphasizes the importance of accounting for positionality and recognizing different perceptions of China as a global actor. It suggests analytical registers of relationality, global capitalist processes, language and discourse power, and planetary scale modernization to guide future research on Global China. By adopting these registers, researchers can better understand the multifaceted factors shaping Global China within the broader global context of competition and crisis.
Klassifikation (DDC)
300 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie, Anthropologie 320 Politik 330 Wirtschaft 950 Geschichte AsiensErschienen in
Routledge handbook on Global China, S. 433-451Erstpublikation
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003044710-38Mayer, Maximilian; Kavalski, Emilian; Rudyak, Marina; Zhang, Xin: Global China : Epistemic Traps and Analytical Registers. In: Routledge handbook on Global China. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2025. 433-451.
Online-Ausgabe in bonndoc: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/13681
Online-Ausgabe in bonndoc: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/13681
@inbook{handle:20.500.11811/13681,
author = {{Maximilian Mayer} and {Emilian Kavalski} and {Marina Rudyak} and {Xin Zhang}},
title = {Global China : Epistemic Traps and Analytical Registers},
publisher = {Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group},
year = 2025,
booktitle = {Routledge handbook on Global China},
pages = 433--451,
note = {The contributions to The Routledge Handbook on Global China highlight the diverse and dynamic relations between Global China and multiple actors, contexts and agencies. The relationship between China's international outreach and the effects of Global China is not straightforward, and understanding the nature and implications of China's rise requires acknowledging the multiple sites, voices and faces of Global China. The Handbook reveals epistemic traps that hinder the understanding of Global China, such as othering and strategic narcissism. It argues for a more nuanced approach that embraces alternative perspectives and challenges existing binaries. The Handbook also emphasizes the importance of accounting for positionality and recognizing different perceptions of China as a global actor. It suggests analytical registers of relationality, global capitalist processes, language and discourse power, and planetary scale modernization to guide future research on Global China. By adopting these registers, researchers can better understand the multifaceted factors shaping Global China within the broader global context of competition and crisis.},
url = {https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/13681}
}
author = {{Maximilian Mayer} and {Emilian Kavalski} and {Marina Rudyak} and {Xin Zhang}},
title = {Global China : Epistemic Traps and Analytical Registers},
publisher = {Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group},
year = 2025,
booktitle = {Routledge handbook on Global China},
pages = 433--451,
note = {The contributions to The Routledge Handbook on Global China highlight the diverse and dynamic relations between Global China and multiple actors, contexts and agencies. The relationship between China's international outreach and the effects of Global China is not straightforward, and understanding the nature and implications of China's rise requires acknowledging the multiple sites, voices and faces of Global China. The Handbook reveals epistemic traps that hinder the understanding of Global China, such as othering and strategic narcissism. It argues for a more nuanced approach that embraces alternative perspectives and challenges existing binaries. The Handbook also emphasizes the importance of accounting for positionality and recognizing different perceptions of China as a global actor. It suggests analytical registers of relationality, global capitalist processes, language and discourse power, and planetary scale modernization to guide future research on Global China. By adopting these registers, researchers can better understand the multifaceted factors shaping Global China within the broader global context of competition and crisis.},
url = {https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/13681}
}
Die folgenden Nutzungsbestimmungen sind mit dieser Ressource verbunden:
