<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>BCDSS Working Papers</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/10037" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/10037</id>
<updated>2026-05-03T11:58:31Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-05-03T11:58:31Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Prostitution / Servitude / Slavery</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/11887" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Münch, Birgit Ulrike</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/11887</id>
<updated>2024-08-20T14:00:22Z</updated>
<published>2024-07-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Prostitution / Servitude / Slavery
Münch, Birgit Ulrike
This working paper seeks to explore the concept of asymmetrical dependency from an art and &#13;
cultural historical perspective. Prostitution and sex work are central domains in which female &#13;
dependency was negotiated and bargained over during the early modern period. The aim of &#13;
this project is to modify the network of different asymmetrical dependencies as it relates to&#13;
female occupations, in particular to female prostitution in Amsterdam in the seventeenth and &#13;
eighteenth centuries, which is critically shaped by the role of the globalized metropolis in &#13;
Dutch colonialism. The final section will focus on the concrete example of the exhibition on &#13;
Dutch still lives “Augenlust,” co-curated by the author (LVR-Landesmuseum Bonn, 23.09.22–&#13;
20.02.23, held in cooperation with the Museum Allard Pierson Amsterdam), in which several &#13;
cabinets were dedicated to the theme of asymmetrical dependency.
</summary>
<dc:date>2024-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Transcending Boundaries: Rethinking Slave Agency in the Ottoman Empire Through Religious Conversion Practices</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/11527" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Wagner, Veruschka</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Gökçe, Zeynep Yeşim</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Abacı, Zeynep Dörtok</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Allahverdiyeva, Turkana</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/11527</id>
<updated>2024-05-13T08:45:27Z</updated>
<published>2024-05-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Transcending Boundaries: Rethinking Slave Agency in the Ottoman Empire Through Religious Conversion Practices
Wagner, Veruschka; Gökçe, Zeynep Yeşim; Abacı, Zeynep Dörtok; Allahverdiyeva, Turkana
This article explores the religious conversion of slaves in the Ottoman Empire and the Crimea &#13;
as a profound and transforming event in the lives of slaves. We will analyze the conditions, &#13;
reasons, and consequences of conversion by studying court records from different cities from &#13;
the 16th to 18th centuries. It will also explore the relation between religious conversion and &#13;
the agency of the slaves. The primary research inquiries that this working paper seeks to &#13;
address are as follows: What impact did religious conversion have on the agency of the slaves? &#13;
What was the impact of conversion on their lives (as well as the lives of their slave owners) &#13;
during and after being enslaved? Do the circumstances and effects of conversion differ &#13;
between male and female slaves? This study aims to elucidate these inquiries in an endeavor &#13;
to offer a new perspective on the relation between enslavement and conversion.
</summary>
<dc:date>2024-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>El(-GOD) as “Father in Regalness”. Mine M in Serabit el Khadim as a Middle-Bronze-Age (c.  1900 BC) Working Space sacralised by Early Alefbetic Writing</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/11096" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Morenz, Ludwig D.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/11096</id>
<updated>2024-04-03T11:16:41Z</updated>
<published>2023-09-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">El(-GOD) as “Father in Regalness”. Mine M in Serabit el Khadim as a Middle-Bronze-Age (c.  1900 BC) Working Space sacralised by Early Alefbetic Writing
Morenz, Ludwig D.
This paper grew out of an archaeological field season conducted in southwestern Sinai by the Department of Egyptology at the University of Bonn during November and December 2022. It specifically discusses the social and cultural relations between Egyptians and Canaanites in southwestern Sinai during the Middle Bronze Age (the first half of the second millennium BC), focussing on the inscription S 357 which was carved into the rock face inside a large copper and turquoise mine. By invoking the god El, the inscription sacralized the workspace. This paper seeks to understand mine and inscription within a cultural-historical polygon made up of landscape, ethnicity, economy, religion, and media.; Die folgenden Überlegungen basieren auf einer archäologischen Feldkampagne der Abteilung für Ägyptologie an der Universität Bonn vom November und Dezember 2022 in den Süd-West-Sinai. Konkret werden die Sozial- und Kulturbeziehungen zwischen Ägyptern und Kanaanäern im mittelbrontzezeitlichen Süd-West-Sinai (erste Hälfte 2. Jahrtausend v. Chr.) diskutiert. Im Zentrum steht die Inschrift S 357, die im Inneren einer großen Kupfer- und Türkismine in die Felswand gemeißelt wurde. Mit der Anrufung des Gottes El wurde der Arbeitsbereich sakralisiert. Mine und Inschrift werden im kulturgeschichtlichen Fünfeck von Landschaft, Ethnizität, Ökonomie, Religion und Medien zu verstehen gesucht.
</summary>
<dc:date>2023-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Dependency at the Centre and Periphery of the Tibetan Empire</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/10919" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Doney, Lewis</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/10919</id>
<updated>2024-04-03T10:54:58Z</updated>
<published>2023-06-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Dependency at the Centre and Periphery of the Tibetan Empire
Doney, Lewis
This paper presents a microhistory of ninth-century asymmetrical social relations in the centre &#13;
and on the periphery of the Tibetan empire (ca. 600–850 CE), as well as relations between the &#13;
periphery and the centre. During the reign of the Yar lung dynasty’s Emperor Khri Srong lde &#13;
brtsan (r. 756–ca. 800), official documents such as inscriptions represent him as a beneficent &#13;
ruler of loyal ministers from elite families and as establishing Buddhism for the benefit of his &#13;
rather non-descript but grateful subjects. The analysis of these rhetorical “sayings” then gives &#13;
way to describing the “doings” in Dunhuang on the periphery of that empire, inhabited by &#13;
mostly ethnic Chinese people who both perpetuated and worked within systems of &#13;
asymmetrical dependency. Eighth- and ninth-century Tibetan emperors gradually introduced&#13;
new rules for the Tibetan government of both monastic and lay organisations of Buddhists &#13;
there, and they also employed many of the monks and laity as scribes to copy Buddhist works &#13;
for the spiritual benefit of the rulers. Works found at the beginning of the twentieth century &#13;
at the Mogao cave complex near Dunhuang, walled up in Mogao Cave 17 or the so-called &#13;
“library cave,” offer unparalleled access to their “doings,” the relation of scribes with each &#13;
other, with sutra editors, and with Tibetan imperial power right up to the emperors &#13;
themselves. They thus fill out our image of the “interagency” between Tibetan subjects and &#13;
their asymmetrical relations to the Tibetan empire—while problematizing the emperors’ self representational “sayings” in, inter alia, the imperial inscriptions.
</summary>
<dc:date>2023-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
