<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Oralmedizinische Technologie</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/1503" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/1503</id>
<updated>2026-04-10T23:17:34Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-10T23:17:34Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Comparative Analysis of Shear Bond Strength in Orthodontic Brackets Between Milled and 3D-Printed Definitive CAD/CAM Restorations</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/13334" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Aldosari, Mohammad A.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Anany, Noha M.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Alaqeely, Razan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Alsenaidi, Jawaher</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Sufyan, Aref</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Talaat, Sameh</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Bourauel, Christoph</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Elshazly, Tarek M.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Alhotan, Abdulaziz</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/13334</id>
<updated>2025-08-08T11:31:30Z</updated>
<published>2024-10-18T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Comparative Analysis of Shear Bond Strength in Orthodontic Brackets Between Milled and 3D-Printed Definitive CAD/CAM Restorations
Aldosari, Mohammad A.; Anany, Noha M.; Alaqeely, Razan; Alsenaidi, Jawaher; Sufyan, Aref; Talaat, Sameh; Bourauel, Christoph; Elshazly, Tarek M.; Alhotan, Abdulaziz
&lt;strong&gt;Objective:&lt;/strong&gt; The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatment methods on the shear bond strength (SBS) of metal brackets bonded to two types of CAD/CAM composite restorations: milled and 3D-printed. &lt;strong&gt;Materials and Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;A total of 160 flat-shaped specimens (10 × 10 × 2 mm&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;) were prepared from four different CAD/CAM composites; two milled (Lava Ultimate™ [LU] and Grandio™ [GR]) and two 3D-printed (Crowntec™ [CT] and C&amp;B Permanent™ [CB]). These specimens underwent thermocycling (5000 cycles at 5–55 °C), then were categorized based on the surface treatment into four groups (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 10): Group C (control, no surface treatment), Group HF (treated with 9.6% hydrofluoric acid), Group DB (mechanical roughening by a diamond bur), and Group SB (sandblasting using aluminum oxide). Metal brackets were bonded using Transbond XT Primer and universal adhesive, stored in artificial saliva for 24 h, then thermo-cycled again. Shear bond strength (SBS) was tested using a universal testing machine until bracket debonding occurred. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was assessed using a stereomicroscope to quantify the residual adhesive following debonding. &lt;strong&gt;Result: &lt;/strong&gt;Regarding material, GR and LU restorations had significantly higher SBS values compared to CT and CB, ranging from 13.90 MPa to 20.35 MPa. Regarding surface treatment, SB and HF groups showed significantly higher SBS values. The ARI scores showed different adhesive modes of failure, with higher instances of scores 0 and 1, which indicate no or minimal adhesive remaining. &lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Both milled and 3D-printed materials had adequate SBS for clinical use, with milled materials showing superior results. Surface treatments like sandblasting and HF significantly improved bond strength, with adhesive failure being common.
</summary>
<dc:date>2024-10-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Force system of 3D-printed orthodontic aligners made of shape memory polymers</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/13282" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Sharif, Madina</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Bourauel, Christoph</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Ghoneima, Ahmed</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Schwarze, Jörg</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Alhotan, Abdulaziz</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Elshazly, Tarek M.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/13282</id>
<updated>2025-07-29T11:31:29Z</updated>
<published>2024-06-10T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Force system of 3D-printed orthodontic aligners made of shape memory polymers
Sharif, Madina; Bourauel, Christoph; Ghoneima, Ahmed; Schwarze, Jörg; Alhotan, Abdulaziz; Elshazly, Tarek M.
This study aimed to report forces and moments delivered by 3D-printed aligners. Tera Harz TC-85 resin and Zendura FLX (ZF) thermoformed sheets (0.76 mm) were used. Rectangular strip specimens (50 × 10 × 0.6 mm) were produced for a three-point bending test (3PB) at different temperatures. Full anatomical aligners were produced for 3D force measurements on different teeth and directions at 37 °C, using a custom-made device. ZF exhibited flexural forces between 1.7 and 2.3 N, while TC-85 from 0.3 N to 2.7 N, with temperature affecting TC-85 more significantly. At lower temperatures, TC-85 was stiffer than ZF, but at higher temperatures, it became less rigid. The 3D-force measurements indicated comparable values for both materials. Force ranged from 0.3–1.7 N and moment from 4.8–9.4 Nmm. The study concluded that TC-85 3D-printed aligners deliver biologically compatible forces for orthodontic movement and offer better control over thickness.
</summary>
<dc:date>2024-06-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Effect of the Height of a 3D-Printed Model on the Force Transmission and Thickness of Thermoformed Orthodontic Aligners</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/13281" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Ghoraba, Omar</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Bourauel, Christoph</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Aldesoki, Mostafa</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Singer, Lamia</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Ismail, Ahmed M.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Elattar, Hanaa</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Alhotan, Abdulaziz</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Elshazly, Tarek M.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/13281</id>
<updated>2025-07-29T11:03:34Z</updated>
<published>2024-06-20T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Effect of the Height of a 3D-Printed Model on the Force Transmission and Thickness of Thermoformed Orthodontic Aligners
Ghoraba, Omar; Bourauel, Christoph; Aldesoki, Mostafa; Singer, Lamia; Ismail, Ahmed M.; Elattar, Hanaa; Alhotan, Abdulaziz; Elshazly, Tarek M.
This research aims to investigate the influence of model height employed in the deep drawing of orthodontic aligner sheets on force transmission and aligner thickness. Forty aligner sheets (Zendura FLX) were thermoformed over four models of varying heights (15, 20, 25, and 30 mm). Normal contact force generated on the facial surface of the upper right central incisor (Tooth 11) was measured using pressure-sensitive films. Aligner thickness around Tooth 11 was measured at five points. A digital caliper and a micro-computed tomography (μ-CT) were employed for thickness measurements. The normal contact force exhibited an uneven distribution across the facial surface of Tooth 11. Model 15 displayed the highest force (88.9 ± 23.2 N), while Model 30 exhibited the lowest (45.7 ± 15.8 N). The force distribution was more favorable for bodily movement with Model 15. Thickness measurements revealed substantial thinning of the aligner after thermoforming. This thinning was most pronounced at the incisal edge (50% of the original thickness) and least at the gingivo-facial part (85%). Additionally, there was a progressive reduction in aligner thickness with increasing model height, which was most significant on the facial tooth surfaces. We conclude that the thermoplastic aligner sheets undergo substantial thinning during the thermoforming process, which becomes more pronounced as the height of the model increases. As a result, there is a decrease in both overall and localized force transmission, which could lead to increased tipping by the aligner and a diminished ability to achieve bodily movement.
</summary>
<dc:date>2024-06-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Physiochemical and mechanical characterisation of orthodontic 3D printed aligner material made of shape memory polymers (4D aligner material)</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/13017" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Atta, Islam</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Bourauel, Christoph</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Alkabani, Yasmine</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Mohamed, Nesreen</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Kim, Hoon</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Alhotan, Abdulaziz</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Ghoneima, Ahmed</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Elshazly, Tarek</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/13017</id>
<updated>2025-04-24T09:46:47Z</updated>
<published>2023-12-25T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Physiochemical and mechanical characterisation of orthodontic 3D printed aligner material made of shape memory polymers (4D aligner material)
Atta, Islam; Bourauel, Christoph; Alkabani, Yasmine; Mohamed, Nesreen; Kim, Hoon; Alhotan, Abdulaziz; Ghoneima, Ahmed; Elshazly, Tarek
&lt;em&gt;Objectives:&lt;/em&gt; To conduct a physiochemical and mechanical material analysis on 3D printed shape-memory aligners in comparison to thermoformed aligners.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;em&gt;Materials and methods:&lt;/em&gt; Four materials were examined, including three thermoformed materials: CA Pro (CP), Zendura A (ZA), Zendura FLX (ZF), and one 3D printed material: Tera Harz (TC-85). Rectangular strips measuring 50 × 10 × 0.5 mm were produced from each material. Five tests were conducted, including differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), shape recovery tests, three-points bending (3 PB), and Vickers surface microhardness (VH).&lt;br /&gt; &lt;em&gt;Results:&lt;/em&gt; DSC recorded glass transition temperatures (Tg) at 79.9 °C for CP, 92.2 °C for ZA, 107.1 °C for ZF, and 42.3 °C for TC-85. In DMA analysis at 20–45 °C, a prominent decrease in storage modulus was observed, exclusively for TC-85, as the temperature increased. Notably, within the temperature range of 30–45 °C, TC-85 exhibited substantial shape recovery after 10 min, reaching up to 86.1 %, while thermoformed materials showed minimal recovery (1.5–2.9 %). In 3 PB test (at 30, 37, 45 °C), ZA demonstrated the highest force at 2 mm bending, while TC-85 exhibited the lowest. Regarding VH at room temperature, there was a significant decrease for both ZA and ZF after thermoforming. ZA had the highest hardness, followed by ZF and TC-85, with CP showing the lowest values.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;em&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/em&gt; TC-85 demonstrates exceptional shape memory at oral temperature, improving adaptation, reducing force decay, and enabling, together with its higher flexibility, extensive tooth movement per step. Additionally, it maintains microhardness similar to thermoformed sheets, ensuring the durability and effectiveness of dental aligners.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;em&gt;Clinical relevance:&lt;/em&gt; The 3D printed aligner material with shape memory characteristics (4D aligner) has revolutionized the orthodontic aligner field. It showed mechanical properties more suitable for orthodontic treatment than thermoforming materials. Additionally, it offers enhanced control over aligner design and thickness, while optimizing the overall workflow. It also minimizes material wastage, and reduces production expenses.
</summary>
<dc:date>2023-12-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
