<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Crossroads Asia Working Paper Series</title>
<link>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/57</link>
<description>Working Paper des Kompetenz-Netzwerks Crossroads Asia</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 07:29:34 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:date>2026-04-13T07:29:34Z</dc:date>

<item>
<title>Beyond kinship and tribe: New forms of solidarity and interest representation in Nangarhar province, Afghanistan</title>
<link>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/528</link>
<description>Beyond kinship and tribe: New forms of solidarity and interest representation in Nangarhar province, Afghanistan
Kandiwal, Wali Mohammad
Baldauf, Ingeborg; Conermann, Stephan; Kreutzmann, Hermann; Nadjmabadi, Shahnaz; Reetz, Dietrich; Schetter, Conrad; Sökefeld, Martin; Bech Hansen, Claus Erik; Hornidge, Anna-Katharina; Mielke, Katja
In this paper, I show that the establishment of unauthorized settlements on government land in the newly urbanizing peripheries of Jalalabad – the second-fastest growing city of Afghanistan – corresponded with the emergence of a new type of interest representation manifest in locally established inclusive interest representation bodies (shura). Taking the example of two evolving settlements, I aim to illustrate how two newly established shuras, based on inclusive social – albeit not tribal or kinship-based – representation of all resident households, present a new mode of solidarity mechanism in urbanizing Pashtun society.
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/528</guid>
<dc:date>2016-12-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Territory, border, infrastructure</title>
<link>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/527</link>
<description>Territory, border, infrastructure
Kinzley, Judd; Joniak-Lüthi, Agnieszka
Baldauf, Ingeborg; Conermann, Stephan; Kreutzmann, Hermann; Nadjmabadi, Shahnaz; Reetz, Dietrich; Schetter, Conrad; Sökefeld, Martin; Bech Hansen, Claus Erik; Hornidge, Anna-Katharina; Mielke, Katja
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/527</guid>
<dc:date>2016-12-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Crossroads Studies and the State: Anthropological Perspectives</title>
<link>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/526</link>
<description>Crossroads Studies and the State: Anthropological Perspectives
Sökefeld, Martin
Baldauf, Ingeborg; Conermann, Stephan; Kreutzmann, Hermann; Nadjmabadi, Shahnaz; Reetz, Dietrich; Schetter, Conrad; Sökefeld, Martin; Bech Hansen, Claus Erik; Hornidge, Anna-Katharina; Mielke, Katja; Schetter, Conrad
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/526</guid>
<dc:date>2016-12-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Boundaries and Identities: The Case of Gilgit-Baltistan</title>
<link>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/169</link>
<description>Boundaries and Identities: The Case of Gilgit-Baltistan
Dad, Aziz Ali
Baldauf, Ingeborg; Conermann, Stephan; Kreutzmann, Hermann; Nadjmabadi, Shahnaz; Reetz, Dietrich; Schetter, Conrad; Sökefeld, Martin; Bech Hansen, Claus Erik; Hornidge, Anna-Katharina; Mielke, Katja; Nokkala, Nelli
The main argument of the paper is that the absence of Gilgit-Baltistan in the power dispensation and state structure of Pakistan has created a power vacuum in the society, which is gradually filled by sectarian forces, nationalist movements, ethnic movements and regional associations. These actors attempt to rearticulate identities in Gilgit-Baltistan with direct repercussions for the region’s association to the Kashmir dispute. The ways in which these identities are rearticulated reject the official narratives of the state and Kashmiri nationalism. Thus, Gilgit-Baltistan’s path is diverging after having shared a history with Kashmir during the colonial period. Under the new political dispensation in the post-colonial period, it has become subservient to the Kashmir dispute.&#13;
This paper examines processes of identity articulation by religious, nationalist and ethnic groups that show the drifting of the region away from Kashmir. Although the region has been kept in a constitutional limbo by Pakistan due to the Kashmir dispute,  the changes brought about by broader regional developments and increased communication have triggered political, economic and cultural processes that exceed the received narratives posited by the state and Kashmiri nationalism. The emergence of new local identity narratives has social and political ramifications because it compels certain sectarian quarters and nationalists to rethink their views about the identity of Gilgit-Baltistan vis-à-vis Kashmir on the one hand, and expunge the Kashmir question from the identity formation among ethnic and regional groups on the other hand. Similarly, the paper considers mutations in the notion of identity in tandem with vicissitudes of history and thereby treats identity in the modern period as fragmented and fractured under the influences of forces that are indigenous and exogenous to the region. While exploring the processes of reformulation of identities in Gilgit-Baltistan, the paper identifies emerging contours of new identities among different segments of society in a fluid transformation.
</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/169</guid>
<dc:date>2016-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
