<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie</title>
<link>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/821</link>
<description/>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 20:08:58 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:date>2026-04-10T20:08:58Z</dc:date>
<item>
<title>Cognitive deficits in treatment-resistant depression</title>
<link>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/13781</link>
<description>Cognitive deficits in treatment-resistant depression
Ronold, Eivind Haga; Jensen, Daniel; Thorsen, Anders Lillevik L.; Raudeberg, Rune; Oltedal, Leif; Hammar, Åsa; Hirnstein, Marco; Douglas, Katie; Porter, Richard; Kiebs, Maximilian
&lt;strong&gt;Introduction&lt;/strong&gt; Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a major global healthcare challenge. This is, in part, due to the lack of treatment response and chronic course of MDD. Such a course of illness is often termed treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and is seen in over one-third of people with MDD. Reasons for treatment resistance are not well established, nor is the definition of TRD. Duration and severity of depression, however, are associated with TRD and are also associated with cognitive deficits. Thus, TRD could be particularly prone to cognitive deficits and at heightened risk for neuroprogression. While the cognitive profile of MDD has been investigated in several systematic reviews, no systematic review of cognition in TRD exists to date. The present study will fill this gap in the literature. It is expected that TRD will show more severe cognitive deficits than generally reported in MDD and deficits in all cognitive functions are expected. &lt;br/&gt;&#13;
&lt;strong&gt;Methods and Analysis&lt;/strong&gt; A systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines will be performed of the databases Embase, Pubmed/MEDLINE, PsychINFO and Cochrane including peer-reviewed studies on humans using standardised cognitive tests. Pilot searching was performed in January 2025 and the full search will be commenced in June 2025, with additional searches following completion. Where sufficient data are reported, a meta-analysis comparing deficits in TRD with MDD and healthy control participants will be performed; alternatively, effects based on norms will be calculated. Meta-regression, subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be conducted to explore moderators that are sufficiently reported in the literature. The quality of studies will be assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/13781</guid>
<dc:date>2025-07-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Therapeutic alliance in individual adult psychotherapy</title>
<link>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/13296</link>
<description>Therapeutic alliance in individual adult psychotherapy
Saxler, Eva; Schindler, Theresa; Philipsen, Alexandra; Schulze, Marcel; Lux, Silke
&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt; The therapeutic alliance (TA) is a robust and pantheoretical predictor of treatment outcome in Face-to-Face- (F2F-) and Online-psychotherapy (Online-PT). Many authors have proposed several conceptualizations of TA, which are oftentimes operationalized. The resulting diversity of conceptualizations and measures is presented in this review.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Methods:&lt;/strong&gt; We performed a three-parted literature search for self-report-instruments of TA in individual, voluntary F2F-PT with adults (1. utilization of past reviews, 2. systematic literature search yielding 5,205 articles, 3. reference lists). Analogously, we conducted a systematic literature search for instruments of TA in the Online-setting (yielding 200 articles). Additionally, we analyzed the content of the instruments qualitatively.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Results:&lt;/strong&gt; A current overview of 48 instruments for measuring TA (46 for F2F-PT, 2 for Online-PT) including their conceptual backgrounds, characteristics and main content aspects is presented. Most instruments (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 24) operationalize one or more theoretical conceptualizations of TA. Other instruments are adaptation/ syntheses of existing measures (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 14), based on literature searches (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 3) or on an empirical survey (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 3) and two instruments provide no conceptual background information. The content of the instruments mainly focused on the following aspects: 1. Self-disclosure and authenticity; 2. Agreement; 3. Active participation, motivation and compliance; 4. Trust and secure attachment; and 5. Considering needs/abilities/wishes of the patient. Additionally, a narrative review of various approaches to conceptualize TA is presented and linked to respective corresponding instruments.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Discussion:&lt;/strong&gt; The broad variety of conceptualizations and measures of TA makes coherent research on TA difficult. There are conceptual challenges such as the role of attachment style in TA that remain to be clarified. The current conceptualizations and measures do not incorporate the practical experience and expertise of psychotherapists and patients sufficiently. A metatheoretical conceptualization and measure of TA based on an empirical survey of psychotherapists and patients could address these issues.
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/13296</guid>
<dc:date>2024-06-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder</title>
<link>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/13234</link>
<description>Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Gaspar, Nikolas; Kilarski, Laura Luisa; Rosen, Helena; Huppertz, Maximilian; Philipsen, Alexandra; Rohner, Henrik
&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt; Substance use disorders present a tremendous challenge within contemporary healthcare systems. Specifically, in the domain of opioid use disorders (OUDs), several foundational elements are crucial for the efficacious management of afflicted individuals. Regrettably, the premature discontinuation of inpatient opioid withdrawal treatment is a prevalent phenomenon. This study aims to elucidate the prevalence of the premature termination of inpatient opioid withdrawal treatment among patients with comorbid ADHD. &lt;strong&gt;Methods:&lt;/strong&gt; We conducted a comprehensive assessment of all participants currently undergoing inpatient opioid withdrawal treatment. Our assessment protocol included the administration of the ADHD Self-Report Scale (ADHD-SR) and the Wender Utah Rating Scale (WURS-k). Additionally, participants who met the thresholds on one or both questionnaires underwent further evaluation using the Diagnostic Interview for ADHD in Adults (DIVA-2.0). &lt;strong&gt;Results:&lt;/strong&gt; The prevalence of individuals diagnosed with ADHD within the studied cohort was determined to be 29.3%. Among the subset of participants identified as ADHD-positive, a notable 54.5% prematurely ceased therapy. In contrast, among those identified as ADHD-negative, the premature discontinuation rate was substantially lower at 28.3%. &lt;strong&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/strong&gt; In summary, the impact of ADHD as a comorbid condition on the efficacy of inpatient opioid withdrawal treatment has been underscored. By identifying comorbid ADHD early in the treatment process, tailored therapeutic approaches may help to maximize the effectiveness of interventions and may improve patient outcomes. This underscores the importance of proactive screening for ADHD as a psychiatric comorbidity in optimizing the management of individuals undergoing inpatient opioid withdrawal treatment.
</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/13234</guid>
<dc:date>2024-06-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Altered interaction of physiological activity and behavior affects risky decision-making in ADHD</title>
<link>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/13156</link>
<description>Altered interaction of physiological activity and behavior affects risky decision-making in ADHD
Halbe, Eva; Kolf, Fabian; Heger, Alina Sophie; Hüpen, Philippa; Bergmann, Moritz; Aslan, Behrem; Harrison, Ben J.; Davey, Christopher G.; Philipsen, Alexandra; Lux, Silke
&lt;b&gt;Background:&lt;/b&gt; Adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is often associated with risky decision-making behavior. However, current research studies are often limited by the ability to adequately reflect daily behavior in a laboratory setting. Over the lifespan impairments in cognitive functions appear to improve, whereas affective functions become more severe. We assume that risk behavior in ADHD arises predominantly from deficits in affective processes. This study will therefore aim to investigate whether a dysfunction in affective pathways causes an abnormal risky decision-making (DM) behavior in adult ADHD.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;b&gt;Methods:&lt;/b&gt; Twenty-eight participants with ADHD and twenty-eight healthy controls completed a battery of questionnaires regarding clinical symptoms, self-assessment of behavior and emotional competence. Furthermore, skin conductance responses were measured during the performance in a modified version of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task. A linear mixed-effects model analysis was used to analyze emotional arousal prior to a decision and after feedback display.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; Results showed higher emotional arousal in ADHD participants before decision-making (β = −0.12, SE = 0.05, &lt;em&gt;t&lt;/em&gt; = −2.63, &lt;em&gt;p&lt;/em&gt; &lt; 0.001) and after feedback display (β = −0.14, SE = 0.05, &lt;em&gt;t&lt;/em&gt; = −2.66, &lt;em&gt;p&lt;/em&gt; = 0.008). Although risky behavior was greater in HC than in ADHD, we found a significant interaction effect of group and anticipatory skin conductance responses regarding the response behavior (β = 107.17, SE = 41.91, &lt;em&gt;t&lt;/em&gt; = 2.56, &lt;em&gt;p&lt;/em&gt; = 0.011). Post &lt;em&gt;hoc&lt;/em&gt; analyses revealed a positive correlation between anticipatory skin conductance responses and reaction time in HC, whereas this correlation was negative in ADHD. Self-assessment results were in line with the objective measurements.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;b&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/b&gt; We found altered changes in physiological activity during a risky decision-making task. The results confirm the assumption of an aberrant relationship between bodily response and risky behavior in adult ADHD. However, further research is needed with respect to age and gender when considering physiological activities.
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/13156</guid>
<dc:date>2023-04-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
