Q in Context IThe Separation between the Just and the Unjust in Early Judaism and in the Sayings Source
Q in Context I
The Separation between the Just and the Unjust in Early Judaism and in the Sayings Source
Dokument öffnen (2.5MB)Datum der Veröffentlichung
2015Verlag / herausgebende Einrichtung
V&R unipress GmbHVerlagsort
GöttingenMetadaten
Zur Langanzeige
Zitierbarer Link (Handle URI) 
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/1079
Inhalt
The “Parting of the Ways” between Jews and Christians has only recently been extended to the question as to whether the Gospel Source Q still has to be considered “Jewish”. Especially the question of polemics seems to be crucial: Does the polemical language in Q indicate a past rupture between Q-people and Jews? Apocalyptic groups in early Judaism adopted a very polemical language of judgement, exclusion and condemnation of rival Jewish competitors and highlight the conception of the eschatological damnation of a part of Israel. Thus, polemics in Q could also be interpreted as an inner-Jewish struggle for the true apocalyptic interpretation of the Torah rather than as an already completed “Parting of the Ways”.
Schlagwörter
Christentum, Apokalyptik, Christlich-jüdische Beziehungen, Frühjudentum, Judentum, Judaistik, Tora, Logienquelle, Dialog, christlich-jüdisch, Polemik
Klassifikation (DDC)
230 Theologie, Christentum 290 Andere ReligionenErstpublikation
http://www.v-r.de/de/q_in_context_i/t-16/1036462/https://doi.org/10.14220/9783737003223
Reihe, Nummer
Bonner Biblische Beiträge ; 172ISBN/ISSN zugehöriger Publikation(en)
978-3-8471-0322-6978-3-8470-0322-9
Tiwald, Markus (Hrsg.): Q in Context I : The Separation between the Just and the Unjust in Early Judaism and in the Sayings Source. Göttingen: V&R unipress GmbH, 2015. In: Tiwald, Markus (Hrsg.): Bonner Biblische Beiträge, 172.
Online-Ausgabe in bonndoc: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/1079
Online-Ausgabe in bonndoc: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/1079
@book{handle:20.500.11811/1079,
editor = {{Markus Tiwald}},
title = {Q in Context I : The Separation between the Just and the Unjust in Early Judaism and in the Sayings Source},
publisher = {V&R unipress GmbH},
year = 2015,
series = {Bonner Biblische Beiträge},
volume = 172,
note = {The “Parting of the Ways” between Jews and Christians has only recently been extended to the question as to whether the Gospel Source Q still has to be considered “Jewish”. Especially the question of polemics seems to be crucial: Does the polemical language in Q indicate a past rupture between Q-people and Jews? Apocalyptic groups in early Judaism adopted a very polemical language of judgement, exclusion and condemnation of rival Jewish competitors and highlight the conception of the eschatological damnation of a part of Israel. Thus, polemics in Q could also be interpreted as an inner-Jewish struggle for the true apocalyptic interpretation of the Torah rather than as an already completed “Parting of the Ways”.},
url = {https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/1079}
}
editor = {{Markus Tiwald}},
title = {Q in Context I : The Separation between the Just and the Unjust in Early Judaism and in the Sayings Source},
publisher = {V&R unipress GmbH},
year = 2015,
series = {Bonner Biblische Beiträge},
volume = 172,
note = {The “Parting of the Ways” between Jews and Christians has only recently been extended to the question as to whether the Gospel Source Q still has to be considered “Jewish”. Especially the question of polemics seems to be crucial: Does the polemical language in Q indicate a past rupture between Q-people and Jews? Apocalyptic groups in early Judaism adopted a very polemical language of judgement, exclusion and condemnation of rival Jewish competitors and highlight the conception of the eschatological damnation of a part of Israel. Thus, polemics in Q could also be interpreted as an inner-Jewish struggle for the true apocalyptic interpretation of the Torah rather than as an already completed “Parting of the Ways”.},
url = {https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/1079}
}
Die folgenden Nutzungsbestimmungen sind mit dieser Ressource verbunden:
