Show simple item record

Identifying indicators of apple bud dormancy status by exposure to artificial forcing conditions

dc.contributor.authorMilyaev, Anton
dc.contributor.authorBorn, Ute
dc.contributor.authorSprich, Elke
dc.contributor.authorHagemann, Michael
dc.contributor.authorFlachowsky, Henryk
dc.contributor.authorLuedeling, Eike
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-06T15:35:37Z
dc.date.available2025-08-06T15:35:37Z
dc.date.issued31.08.2024
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/13314
dc.description.abstractDormancy in temperate fruit trees is a mechanism of temporary growth suspension, which is vital for tree survival during winter. Studies on this phenomenon frequently employ scientific methods that aim to detect the timing of dormancy release. Dormancy release occurs when trees have been exposed to sufficient chill, allowing them to resume growth under conducive conditions. This study investigates dormancy dynamics in two apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) cultivars, 'Nicoter' and 'Topaz', by sampling branches in an orchard over 14 weeks (2019 to 2020) and over 31 weeks (2021 to 2022) and subjecting them to a 42-day budbreak forcing period in a growth chamber. Temporal changes in budbreak percentages demonstrated dormancy progression in the studied apple cultivars and allowed the three main dormancy phases to be distinguished: paradormancy (summer dormancy), endodormancy (deep dormancy) and ecodormancy (spring dormancy), along with transition periods between them. Using these data, we explored the suitability of several alternative methods to determine endodormancy release. Tabuenca's test, which predicts dormancy release based on the differences in dry weights of buds with and without forcing, showed promise for this purpose. However, our data indicated a need for considerable adjustments and validation of this test. Bud weight and water content of buds in the orchard did not align with budbreak percentages under forcing conditions, rendering them unsuitable for determining endodormancy release in 'Nicoter' and 'Topaz'. Shoot growth cessation did not seem to be connected with either dormancy progression or dormancy depth of the studied cultivars, whereas leaf fall coincided with the beginning of the transition from endo- to ecodormancy. This work addresses methodological limitations in dormancy research and suggests considering the mean time to budbreak and budbreak synchrony as additional criteria to assess tree dormancy status.en
dc.format.extent10
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsNamensnennung 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectbudbreak synchrony
dc.subjectgrowth chamber experiment
dc.subjectpercentage of budbreak
dc.subjectTabuenca's test
dc.subjectwater content in buds
dc.subjectwinter rest
dc.subject.ddc580 Pflanzen (Botanik)
dc.subject.ddc630 Landwirtschaft, Veterinärmedizin
dc.subject.ddc640 Hauswirtschaft und Familienleben
dc.titleIdentifying indicators of apple bud dormancy status by exposure to artificial forcing conditions
dc.typeWissenschaftlicher Artikel
dc.publisher.nameOxford Academic
dc.publisher.locationOxford
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume2024, vol. 44
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issueiss. 10, tpae112
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend10
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpae112
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleTree physiology
ulbbn.pubtypeZweitveröffentlichung
dc.versionpublishedVersion
ulbbn.sponsorship.oaUnifundOA-Förderung Universität Bonn


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

The following license files are associated with this item:

Namensnennung 4.0 International