Zur Kurzanzeige

Unusually warm winter seasons may compromise the performance of current phenology models
Predicting bloom dates in young apple trees with PhenoFlex

dc.contributor.authorFernandez, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorSchiffers, Katja
dc.contributor.authorUrbach, Carsten
dc.contributor.authorLuedeling, Eike
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-28T08:58:32Z
dc.date.available2023-04-28T08:58:32Z
dc.date.issued15.07.2022
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/10786
dc.description.abstractPhenology models are crucial tools for assessing climate change impacts in forestry, ecology and agriculture. Such models are typically calibrated with observational or experimental data and validated with a set of independent observations. While there have been extensive discussions about validation approaches, systematic studies assessing the effects of the calibration data on the predictive performance of the fitted model are scarce. We evaluated the impact of marginal seasons in the calibration data set on the predictive power of an integrated modeling framework (PhenoFlex) that was recently proposed to predict spring phenology in temperate trees. We calibrated PhenoFlex with phenology records of apple trees from a multi-season experiment (59 experimental seasons) that included five unusually warm winter seasons. For comparison, we excluded these marginal seasons in a second version of the analysis. We fitted the 12 model parameters to data, assessed model performance using a common validation data set and evaluated the chill and heat responses during dormancy for both versions. Despite high overall accuracy, our results indicated a better model performance (Root Mean Square Errors of 2.3 versus 5.5 days) when excluding the marginal seasons. We observed a similar shape for the chill response curve across versions but a greater chill effectiveness when including the marginal seasons. Fitted parameters suggest a hard drop in heat efficiency beyond the optimum temperature when including the marginal seasons, probably highlighting the need for more moderate conditions during model calibration. Our results demonstrate a good performance of PhenoFlex when calibration and validation data were comparable, but they also indicate risks involved in using the framework to project phenology under conditions that differ strongly from those used for calibration. Further evaluation and validation under experimentally or naturally occurring warm conditions may improve our understanding of the response of temperate trees to mild winter conditions.de
dc.format.extent11
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsNamensnennung 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectChill requirement
dc.subjectHeat requirement
dc.subjectTree dormancy
dc.subjectMalus domestica
dc.subjectTemperate trees
dc.subjectFlowering
dc.subject.ddc333.7 Natürliche Ressourcen, Energie und Umwelt
dc.subject.ddc580 Pflanzen (Botanik)
dc.titleUnusually warm winter seasons may compromise the performance of current phenology models
dc.title.alternativePredicting bloom dates in young apple trees with PhenoFlex
dc.typeWissenschaftlicher Artikel
dc.publisher.nameElsevier
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume2022, vol. 322
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issueno. 109020
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend11
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.109020
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleAgricultural and Forest Meteorology
ulbbn.pubtypeZweitveröffentlichung
dc.versionpublishedVersion
ulbbn.sponsorship.oaUnifundOA-Förderung Universität Bonn


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige

Die folgenden Nutzungsbestimmungen sind mit dieser Ressource verbunden:

Namensnennung 4.0 International