Griebel, Michael; Harbrecht, Helmut: Approximation of two-variate functions: singular value decomposition versus sparse grids. In: INS Preprints, 1109.
Online-Ausgabe in bonndoc: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/11958
Online-Ausgabe in bonndoc: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/11958
@unpublished{handle:20.500.11811/11958,
author = {{Michael Griebel} and {Helmut Harbrecht}},
title = {Approximation of two-variate functions: singular value decomposition versus sparse grids},
publisher = {Institut für Numerische Simulation (INS)},
year = 2011,
INS Preprints},
volume = 1109,
note = {We compare the cost complexities of two approximation schemes for functions f ∈ Hp(Ω1 × Ω2) which live on the product domain Ω1 × Ω2 of sufficiently smooth domains Ω1 ⊂ ℝn1 and Ω2 ⊂ ℝn2 , namely the singular value / Karhunen-Lòeve decomposition and the sparse grid representation. Here we assume that suitable finite element methods with associated fixed order r of accuracy are given on the domains Ω1 and Ω2. Then, the sparse grid approximation essentially needs only O(ε−q) with q = max{n1,n2}/r unknowns to reach a prescribed accuracy ε provided that the smoothness of f satisfies p ≥ rn1+n2/max{n1,n2} , which is an almost optimal rate. The singular value decomposition produces this rate only if f is analytical since otherwise the decay of the singular values is not fast enough. If p < rn1+n2/max{n1,n2} , then the sparse grid approach gives essentially the rate O(ε−q) with q = n1,n2/p while, for the singular value decomposition, we can only prove the rate O(ε−q) with q = 2min{r,p}min{n1,n2}+2pmax{n1,n2}/ (2p−min{n1,n2})min{r,p} . We derive the resulting complexities, compare the two approaches and present numerical results which demonstrate that these rates are also achieved in numerical practice.},
url = {https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/11958}
}
author = {{Michael Griebel} and {Helmut Harbrecht}},
title = {Approximation of two-variate functions: singular value decomposition versus sparse grids},
publisher = {Institut für Numerische Simulation (INS)},
year = 2011,
INS Preprints},
volume = 1109,
note = {We compare the cost complexities of two approximation schemes for functions f ∈ Hp(Ω1 × Ω2) which live on the product domain Ω1 × Ω2 of sufficiently smooth domains Ω1 ⊂ ℝn1 and Ω2 ⊂ ℝn2 , namely the singular value / Karhunen-Lòeve decomposition and the sparse grid representation. Here we assume that suitable finite element methods with associated fixed order r of accuracy are given on the domains Ω1 and Ω2. Then, the sparse grid approximation essentially needs only O(ε−q) with q = max{n1,n2}/r unknowns to reach a prescribed accuracy ε provided that the smoothness of f satisfies p ≥ rn1+n2/max{n1,n2} , which is an almost optimal rate. The singular value decomposition produces this rate only if f is analytical since otherwise the decay of the singular values is not fast enough. If p < rn1+n2/max{n1,n2} , then the sparse grid approach gives essentially the rate O(ε−q) with q = n1,n2/p while, for the singular value decomposition, we can only prove the rate O(ε−q) with q = 2min{r,p}min{n1,n2}+2pmax{n1,n2}/ (2p−min{n1,n2})min{r,p} . We derive the resulting complexities, compare the two approaches and present numerical results which demonstrate that these rates are also achieved in numerical practice.},
url = {https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/11958}
}