Zur Kurzanzeige

Therapeutic alliance in individual adult psychotherapy

A systematic review of conceptualizations and measures for face-to-face- and online-psychotherapy

dc.contributor.authorSaxler, Eva
dc.contributor.authorSchindler, Theresa
dc.contributor.authorPhilipsen, Alexandra
dc.contributor.authorSchulze, Marcel
dc.contributor.authorLux, Silke
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-01T12:17:11Z
dc.date.available2025-08-01T12:17:11Z
dc.date.issued27.06.2024
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/13296
dc.description.abstractBackground: The therapeutic alliance (TA) is a robust and pantheoretical predictor of treatment outcome in Face-to-Face- (F2F-) and Online-psychotherapy (Online-PT). Many authors have proposed several conceptualizations of TA, which are oftentimes operationalized. The resulting diversity of conceptualizations and measures is presented in this review.
Methods: We performed a three-parted literature search for self-report-instruments of TA in individual, voluntary F2F-PT with adults (1. utilization of past reviews, 2. systematic literature search yielding 5,205 articles, 3. reference lists). Analogously, we conducted a systematic literature search for instruments of TA in the Online-setting (yielding 200 articles). Additionally, we analyzed the content of the instruments qualitatively.
Results: A current overview of 48 instruments for measuring TA (46 for F2F-PT, 2 for Online-PT) including their conceptual backgrounds, characteristics and main content aspects is presented. Most instruments (n = 24) operationalize one or more theoretical conceptualizations of TA. Other instruments are adaptation/ syntheses of existing measures (n = 14), based on literature searches (n = 3) or on an empirical survey (n = 3) and two instruments provide no conceptual background information. The content of the instruments mainly focused on the following aspects: 1. Self-disclosure and authenticity; 2. Agreement; 3. Active participation, motivation and compliance; 4. Trust and secure attachment; and 5. Considering needs/abilities/wishes of the patient. Additionally, a narrative review of various approaches to conceptualize TA is presented and linked to respective corresponding instruments.
Discussion: The broad variety of conceptualizations and measures of TA makes coherent research on TA difficult. There are conceptual challenges such as the role of attachment style in TA that remain to be clarified. The current conceptualizations and measures do not incorporate the practical experience and expertise of psychotherapists and patients sufficiently. A metatheoretical conceptualization and measure of TA based on an empirical survey of psychotherapists and patients could address these issues.
en
dc.format.extent12
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsNamensnennung 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjecttherapeutic alliance
dc.subjectmeasurements
dc.subjectconceptualizations
dc.subjectpsychotherapy
dc.subjectsystematic review
dc.titleTherapeutic alliance in individual adult psychotherapy
dc.title.alternativeA systematic review of conceptualizations and measures for face-to-face- and online-psychotherapy
dc.typeWissenschaftlicher Artikel
dc.publisher.nameFrontiers Media
dc.publisher.locationLausanne
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume2024, vol. 15
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issue1293851
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend12
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1293851
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleFrontiers in Psychology
ulbbn.pubtypeZweitveröffentlichung
dc.versionpublishedVersion
ulbbn.sponsorship.oaUnifundOA-Förderung Universität Bonn


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige

Die folgenden Nutzungsbestimmungen sind mit dieser Ressource verbunden:

Namensnennung 4.0 International