IDEAL–compliant implementation of the Dexter® surgical robot in cholecystectomyA comprehensive framework and clinical outcomes
IDEAL–compliant implementation of the Dexter® surgical robot in cholecystectomy
A comprehensive framework and clinical outcomes

dc.contributor.author | Dohmen, Jonas | |
dc.contributor.author | Weber, Julia | |
dc.contributor.author | Arensmeyer, Jan | |
dc.contributor.author | Feodorovici, Philipp | |
dc.contributor.author | Henn, Jonas | |
dc.contributor.author | Schmidt, Joachim | |
dc.contributor.author | Kalff, Jörg C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Matthaei, Hanno | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-08-12T11:21:30Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-08-12T11:21:30Z | |
dc.date.issued | 30.12.2024 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/13360 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: The integration of advanced technologies is transforming surgical practice, particularly through robotic systems. This study presents the early clinical implementation of the Dexter® surgical robot for cholecystectomy and evaluates clinical outcomes using the IDEAL framework. Methods: Twenty patients underwent elective robotic-assisted cholecystectomy using the Dexter® robot. A thorough implementation process, including rigorous surgeon and nurse training and standardized care protocols, was established. Data on operative metrics, complications, and patient outcomes were analyzed, and patient well-being was assessed via a postoperative phone survey. Results: Six surgeons and thirty nurses were trained, with surgeons completing a minimum of 20 h of simulation. Preoperative and operative times were significantly reduced through this process. Comparing the first 10 operations to the second, docking time decreased from 11.4 ± 4.1 min to 7.1 ± 2.1 min (p=0.0144) and operative time improved from 130.5 ± 25.7 min to 99.7 ± 21.8 min (p=0.0134). Mean intraoperative blood loss was minimal, averaging 19.5 ± 31.4 mL, and the average length of hospital stay was 3.1 ± 1.4 days. Postoperative pain levels were low, and patient satisfaction was high, as assessed by telephone survey. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the value of the IDEAL framework in guiding the systematic evaluation and implementation of new surgical technologies such as the Dexter® robot. A structured approach is essential to improve patient outcomes and safety in the coming digital transformation of surgery. | en |
dc.format.extent | 9 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.rights | Namensnennung 4.0 International | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.subject | dexter surgical robot | |
dc.subject | cholecystectomy | |
dc.subject | robotic surgery | |
dc.subject | IDEAL framework | |
dc.subject | implementation | |
dc.subject | patient safety | |
dc.subject.ddc | 610 Medizin, Gesundheit | |
dc.title | IDEAL–compliant implementation of the Dexter® surgical robot in cholecystectomy | |
dc.title.alternative | A comprehensive framework and clinical outcomes | |
dc.type | Wissenschaftlicher Artikel | |
dc.publisher.name | De Gruyter | |
dc.publisher.location | Berlin | |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume | 2024 | |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart | 1 | |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend | 9 | |
dc.relation.doi | https://doi.org/10.1515/iss-2024-0033 | |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle | Innovative Surgical Sciences | |
ulbbn.pubtype | Zweitveröffentlichung | |
dc.version | publishedVersion | |
ulbbn.sponsorship.oaUnifund | OA-Förderung Universität Bonn |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Publikationen (3)