Show simple item record

Assessment of Climate Models Performance and Associated Uncertainties in Rainfall Projection from CORDEX over the Eastern Nile Basin, Ethiopia

dc.contributor.authorYimer, Sadame
dc.contributor.authorBouanani, Abderrazak
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Navneet
dc.contributor.authorTischbein, Bernhard
dc.contributor.authorBorgemeister, Christian
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-30T12:20:22Z
dc.date.available2023-03-30T12:20:22Z
dc.date.issued27.06.2022
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/10749
dc.description.abstractThe adverse impact of climate change on different regionally important sectors such as agriculture and hydropower is a serious concern and is currently at the epicentre of global interest. Despite the extensive efforts to project the future climate and assess its potential impact, it is surrounded by uncertainties. This study aimed to assess climate models’ performance and associated uncertainties in rainfall projection over the eastern Nile basin, Ethiopia. Seventeen climate models from Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX) and their four ensemble models were evaluated in terms of their historical prediction performance (1986–2005) and future simulation skill (2006–2016) at rainfall station (point location), grid-scale (0.44° × 0.44°) and basin scale. Station-based and spatially interpolated observed rainfall data were used as a reference during climate model performance evaluation. In addition, CRU data was used as an alternative reference data to check the effect of the reference data source on the climate models evaluation process. As the results showed, climate models have a large discrepancy in their projected rainfall and hence prior evaluation of their performance is necessary. For instance, the bias in historical mean annual rainfall averaged over the basin ranges from +760 mm (wet bias) to −582 mm (dry bias). The spatial pattern correlation (r) of climate models output and observed rainfall ranges from −0.1 to 0.7. The ensemble formed with selected (performance-based) member models outperforms the widely used multi-model ensemble in most of the evaluation metrics. This showed the need for reconsidering the widely used multi-model approach in most climate model-based studies. The use of CRU data as a reference resulted in a change in the magnitude of climate model bias. To conclude, each climate model has a certain degree of uncertainty in the rainfall projection, which potentially affects the studies on climate change and its impact (e.g., on water resources). Therefore, climate-related studies have to consider uncertainties in climate projections, which will help end-users (decision-makers) at least to be aware of the potential range of deviation in the future projected outcomes of interest.en
dc.format.extent32
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsNamensnennung 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectclimate change
dc.subjectclimate modelling
dc.subjectCORDEX-RCMs
dc.subjectclimate uncertainty
dc.subjectrainfall projection
dc.subjectclimate model ensemble
dc.subjectEastern Nile Basin
dc.subject.ddc333.7 Natürliche Ressourcen, Energie und Umwelt
dc.titleAssessment of Climate Models Performance and Associated Uncertainties in Rainfall Projection from CORDEX over the Eastern Nile Basin, Ethiopia
dc.typeWissenschaftlicher Artikel
dc.publisher.nameMDPI
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume2022, vol. 10
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issueiss. 7
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend32
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/cli10070095
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleClimate
ulbbn.pubtypeZweitveröffentlichung
dc.versionpublishedVersion
ulbbn.sponsorship.oaUnifundOA-Förderung Universität Bonn


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

The following license files are associated with this item:

Namensnennung 4.0 International