Zur Kurzanzeige

German GPs’ Self-Perceived Role in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Leadership, Participation in Regional Services and Preferences for Future Pandemic Preparedness

dc.contributor.authorKugai, Simon
dc.contributor.authorWild, Dorothea
dc.contributor.authorKrumpholtz, Yelda
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Manuela
dc.contributor.authorBalzer, Katrin
dc.contributor.authorMayerböck, Astrid
dc.contributor.authorWeltermann, Birgitta
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-14T14:51:21Z
dc.date.available2025-02-14T14:51:21Z
dc.date.issued09.06.2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/12819
dc.description.abstractGeneral practitioners (GPs) played a vital role during the COVID-19 pandemic. Little is known about GPs’ view of their role, leadership, participation in regional services and preferences for future pandemic preparedness. This representative study of German GPs comprised a web-based survey and computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI). It addressed GPs’ satisfaction with their role, self-perceived leadership (validated C-LEAD scale), participation in newly established health services, and preferences for future pandemic preparedness (net promotor score; NPS; range −100 to +100%). Statistical analyses were conducted using Spearman’s correlation and Kruskal–Wallis tests. In total, 630 GPs completed the questionnaire and 102 GPs the CATI. In addition to their practice duties, most GPs (72.5%) participated in at least one regional health service, mainly vaccination centres/teams (52.7%). Self-perceived leadership was high with a C-LEAD score of 47.4 (max. 63; SD ± 8.5). Overall, 58.8% were not satisfied with their role which correlated with the feeling of being left alone (r = −0.349, p < 0.001). 77.5 % of respondents believed that political leaders underestimated GPs’ potential contribution to pandemic control. Regarding regional pandemic services, GPs preferred COVID-19 focus practices (NPS +43.7) over diagnostic centres (NPS −31). Many GPs, though highly engaged regionally, were dissatisfied with their role but had clear preferences for future regional services. Future pandemic planning should integrate GPs’ perspectives.en
dc.format.extent14
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsNamensnennung 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectgeneral practitioners
dc.subjectpandemic preparedness
dc.subjectCOVID-19
dc.subjectregional healthcare
dc.subjecthealthcare services
dc.subjectleadership
dc.subjectnationwide survey
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizin, Gesundheit
dc.subject.ddc620 Ingenieurwissenschaften und Maschinenbau
dc.subject.ddc690 Hausbau, Bauhandwerk
dc.titleGerman GPs’ Self-Perceived Role in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Leadership, Participation in Regional Services and Preferences for Future Pandemic Preparedness
dc.typeWissenschaftlicher Artikel
dc.publisher.nameMDPI AG
dc.publisher.locationBasel
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume2023, vol.20
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issue6088
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend14
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20126088
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleInternational journal of environmental research and public health
ulbbn.pubtypeZweitveröffentlichung
dc.versionpublishedVersion
ulbbn.sponsorship.oaUnifundOA-Förderung Universität Bonn


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige

Die folgenden Nutzungsbestimmungen sind mit dieser Ressource verbunden:

Namensnennung 4.0 International