Show simple item record

Measuring Patient Safety Culture in Hospitals
Psychometric performance issues of translated and adapted instruments in different healthcare systems

dc.contributor.advisorManser, Tanja
dc.contributor.authorGambashidze, Nikoloz
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-13T10:36:54Z
dc.date.available2020-10-13T10:36:54Z
dc.date.issued13.10.2020
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/8661
dc.description.abstractIn order to enable continuous improvements in patient safety, establishing patient safety culture (PSC) has been recommended, which supports open communication, and a blame-free environment for individual and organizational learning. In order to establish and promote a positive patient safety culture, hospital managers need to measure it systematically with valid instruments, a number of which have been developed and implemented worldwide. Despite an increasing number of validation studies using different language versions, it is still not clear, to what extend do these instruments perform differently in new environments and to what extent can the results of these studies be compared. The core dimensions of PSC are also not clear, those that are stable across various instruments and various healthcare systems.
In order to facilitate better conceptualization of PSC, to further the development of PSC instruments, and to support the comparability of results across different healthcare systems, this thesis aimed to study various measurement issues associated with the use of translated and adapted versions of established instruments for measuring patient safety culture in hospitals. The data from German, Swiss and Georgian hospitals were used to evaluate the psychometric properties of two PSC instruments, to reveal the PSC dimensions they measure, as well as to study the effects of various instrument- and sample related factors on the psychometric performance of these instruments and on survey results.
Four studies were included in this work. Three validation studies using data from German and Georgian hospitals showed that dimensionality of the instruments may vary between different language versions and/or healthcare systems. The fourth study demonstrated a significant effect of participant characteristics such as profession and managerial functions on study results. Interestingly, these effects were found to vary across healthcare systems. Additionally an effect of reverse item bias on the psychometric properties, as well as on the survey results was demonstrated. Overall, the results of the four studies included in this thesis show that currently available instruments, although useful for studying patient safety culture locally, may not be valid for international comparative studies. Moreover, as the performance and the outcome of these instruments may depend on characteristics of the healthcare system, the sample and the participants, interpretation and comparison of results across studies should be made with extreme caution.
en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsIn Copyright
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectKultur der Patientensicherheit
dc.subjectMessinstrumente
dc.subjectFragebögen
dc.subjectPsychometrische Eigenschaften
dc.subjectKrankenhaus Umfrage
dc.subjectMitarbeiterbefragung
dc.subjectLänderübergreifender Vergleich
dc.subjectPatient Safety Culture
dc.subjectMeasurement instruments
dc.subjectQuestionnaires
dc.subjectHospital survey
dc.subjectEmployee survey
dc.subjectPsychometric properties
dc.subjectCross-national comparison
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizin, Gesundheit
dc.titleMeasuring Patient Safety Culture in Hospitals
dc.title.alternativePsychometric performance issues of translated and adapted instruments in different healthcare systems
dc.typeDissertation oder Habilitation
dc.publisher.nameUniversitäts- und Landesbibliothek Bonn
dc.publisher.locationBonn
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.identifier.urnhttps://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hbz:5-59960
ulbbn.pubtypeErstveröffentlichung
ulbbnediss.affiliation.nameRheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
ulbbnediss.affiliation.locationBonn
ulbbnediss.thesis.levelDissertation
ulbbnediss.dissID5996
ulbbnediss.date.accepted21.08.2020
ulbbnediss.instituteMedizinische Fakultät / Institute : Institut für Patientensicherheit (IfPS)
ulbbnediss.fakultaetMedizinische Fakultät
dc.contributor.coRefereeSchwappach, David


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

The following license files are associated with this item:

InCopyright