Recovering from the constitutional failureAn analysis of the EU reflection period
Recovering from the constitutional failure
An analysis of the EU reflection period
Dokument öffnen (584KB)Datum der Veröffentlichung
2008Verlag / herausgebende Einrichtung
Zentrum für Europäische Integrationsforschung (ZEI)Verlagsort
BonnMetadaten
Zur Langanzeige
Zitierbarer Link (Handle URI) 
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/9903
Inhalt
After the rejection of the European Union’s (EU) Constitutional Treaty in Spring 2005 by both France and the Netherlands, the heads of state and government called for a “reflection period” to provide opportunities to resolve constitutional difficulties, and to further engage Member State citizen populations, national parliaments and political parties. The ultimate aim was to provide sufficient time for Member States to further the Constitutional debate and garner enough support to continue the ratification process. Initially, the reflection period had not been intended to last longer than a year, but in June 2006 the European Council outlined a timeline to reach a solution, extending the deadline until the end of 2008.
Through a six-part analysis, this paper will examine how the European Union used its self-imposed “reflection period” to overcome the constitutional deadlock.
Through a six-part analysis, this paper will examine how the European Union used its self-imposed “reflection period” to overcome the constitutional deadlock.
Schlagwörter
Europäische Union, Verfassung
Klassifikation (DDC)
320 PolitikReihe, Nummer
ZEI Discussion Paper ; C182ISBN/ISSN zugehöriger Publikation(en)
978-3-936183-82-5Recovering from the constitutional failure : An analysis of the EU reflection period. Bonn: Zentrum für Europäische Integrationsforschung (ZEI), 2008. In: Niemann, Anna; Schröder, Sonja Ana Luise; Tunick, Meredith Catherine (Hrsg.): ZEI Discussion Paper, C182.
Online-Ausgabe in bonndoc: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/9903
Online-Ausgabe in bonndoc: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/9903
@techreport{handle:20.500.11811/9903,
editor = {{Anna Niemann} and {Sonja Ana Luise Schröder} and {Meredith Catherine Tunick}},
title = {Recovering from the constitutional failure : An analysis of the EU reflection period},
publisher = {Zentrum für Europäische Integrationsforschung (ZEI)},
year = 2008,
series = {ZEI Discussion Paper},
volume = C182,
note = {After the rejection of the European Union’s (EU) Constitutional Treaty in Spring 2005 by both France and the Netherlands, the heads of state and government called for a “reflection period” to provide opportunities to resolve constitutional difficulties, and to further engage Member State citizen populations, national parliaments and political parties. The ultimate aim was to provide sufficient time for Member States to further the Constitutional debate and garner enough support to continue the ratification process. Initially, the reflection period had not been intended to last longer than a year, but in June 2006 the European Council outlined a timeline to reach a solution, extending the deadline until the end of 2008.
Through a six-part analysis, this paper will examine how the European Union used its self-imposed “reflection period” to overcome the constitutional deadlock.},
url = {https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/9903}
}
editor = {{Anna Niemann} and {Sonja Ana Luise Schröder} and {Meredith Catherine Tunick}},
title = {Recovering from the constitutional failure : An analysis of the EU reflection period},
publisher = {Zentrum für Europäische Integrationsforschung (ZEI)},
year = 2008,
series = {ZEI Discussion Paper},
volume = C182,
note = {After the rejection of the European Union’s (EU) Constitutional Treaty in Spring 2005 by both France and the Netherlands, the heads of state and government called for a “reflection period” to provide opportunities to resolve constitutional difficulties, and to further engage Member State citizen populations, national parliaments and political parties. The ultimate aim was to provide sufficient time for Member States to further the Constitutional debate and garner enough support to continue the ratification process. Initially, the reflection period had not been intended to last longer than a year, but in June 2006 the European Council outlined a timeline to reach a solution, extending the deadline until the end of 2008.
Through a six-part analysis, this paper will examine how the European Union used its self-imposed “reflection period” to overcome the constitutional deadlock.},
url = {https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/9903}
}
Die folgenden Nutzungsbestimmungen sind mit dieser Ressource verbunden:
